egregious? lolYou've spent an egregious amount of time perpetuating the same tired propaganda again and again in this thread.
yes he's in jail."He's in jail."
when multiple women accuse you, there must be a reason for that. right now i believe it's 6 women who are accusing him. if you combine the accusations with what he ACTUALLY SAYS IN HIS VIDEOS about the women who work for him, it really is not hard to believe them."He beats and abuses women."
did i say that? i'm not sure i did. if anything, Tate seems pretty straight forward about what he's doing."He's fraudulent."
it's not my fault that you don't want to read anything or watch anything related to the case and have already made up your mind. i've already said here that you don't need hard evidence when you have multiple witnesses to a crime because the witnesses are evidence. i'm happy to debate whether or not this is a good way to prosecute people, but to say there's no evidence when i've provided plenty here is absurd.None of which you have been able to furnish any proof for btw, and all of which is simply the regurgitation of the mainstream media's biased attacks against him (that they also have zero evidence for).
i agree with you.I have no fucking idea if he's guilty or not; and I really don't care either way. It doesn't erase his accomplishments. If we find out Tom Brady got arrested for something, does that ameliorate his status as the best QB of all time? Not at all. The 2 incidences are unrelated. (And no I'm not saying Tate is the greatest marketer of all time; just providing a comparison as an example.)
i think i maybe have spent an hour total on this thread. i honestly don't care as much as it seems like i do. i'm just on vacation, getting ready for the new year and this story happened, and domestic violence is something i happen to care about so i thought it was a bad sign that people would prop up a guy like this when there's better examples of great marketers.So the question is, why do you care SO much about what one man is doing that you'll spend hours of your life excoriating him on a forum?
egregious? lol
i'm on vacation, bro. this is the lounge. i'm just responding to a thread. don't take it so seriously.
yes he's in jail.
when multiple women accuse you, there must be a reason for that. right now i believe it's 6 women who are accusing him. if you combine the accusations with what he ACTUALLY SAYS IN HIS VIDEOS about the women who work for him, it really is not hard to believe them.
did i say that? i'm not sure i did. if anything, Tate seems pretty straight forward about what he's doing.
it's not my fault that you don't want to read anything or watch anything related to the case and have already made up your mind. i've already said here that you don't need hard evidence when you have multiple witnesses to a crime because the witnesses are evidence. i'm happy to debate whether or not this is a good way to prosecute people, but to say there's no evidence when i've provided plenty here is absurd.
i agree with you.
i think i maybe have spent an hour total on this thread. i honestly don't care as much as it seems like i do. i'm just on vacation, getting ready for the new year and this story happened, and domestic violence is something i happen to care about so i thought it was a bad sign that people would prop up a guy like this when there's better examples of great marketers.
So calling other guys losers IS looser talk?Calling other guys incels and beta-males IS loser talk.
Saying, that YOU, the person, personally have 7 figures in the bank is not loser talk.
One is attacking other people. Essentially calling them pathetic and beneath you.
Me saying I have 7 figures in the bank is not attacking anyone. I'm not saying "you" don't have it, or "you" are a loser. I was responding to a guy who made a cheeky comment about me "losing $50". So I responded in-kind.
So calling other guys losers IS looser talk?
With this inflation "I have 7 figures in the bank" gurus will soon have to change their bragging into "I have 8 figures in the bank"...
Yes, very much so.
Putting your attention on the negative and then focusing more by calling a bunch of people X, Y and Z is not something I would say is conjusive to the mindset of a successful person.
Only unhappy, unfulfilled, unfocused people without purpose go around attacking random groups of people and in the process of doing so always come up with a whole bunch of reasons and justifications for their action, which is mostly just to appease their own ego and help them sleep better at night.
Ultimately all these discussions are pointless. People very rarely change, and rather than openly listen and take on outside perspectives they will just argue. Everyone here in this thread will just blindly argue and cling to their belief that they are right. That there is one world view and everyone outside of their world view is wrong/broken.
Tate is just a person. He isn't evil and he isn't a saint. There are many shades of grey and many agendas at play. Despite this people choose to view it all as black and white, and it's this very black and white thinking that causes people to open themselves up to enslavement in some form or another, even if that enslavement is just rampant consumerism and lack of purpose.
Most people reading this won't even really understand any of the points I'm making. It's ultimately very futile.
Sorry Mr. Splash, my bad.Except, sadly for you, I'm not a guru teaching you how to make money or replicate my success. You'll have to work it out on your own, so calling others "gurus" won't help you there I'm afraid. Most of what I do to make money I wouldn't share publicly.
He is excellent at selling himself, but his products are pure trash. This will catch up with him. In a few years, he'll be a nobody.
Sincerely,
The Data Scientist
I saw yesterday someone mentioned how he was like an early 2000s rap star with his cars, women etc. to make people jealous and want to be like him.
I get the point you're trying to make, but 50 is now a billionaire (or close to it) from his music, TV/movie, and business ventures, so probably not the best example.I saw yesterday someone mentioned how he was like an early 2000s rap star with his cars, women etc. to make people jealous and want to be like him.
i've been researching his courses and i must say i do not have any problem with anything he's selling besides the whole "it's all about controlling women" thing with his webcam business. most of what he sells is the same shit we all see in the IM industry, but that is a new thing. promoting this idea about amassing a buncha hos and abusing them is where i draw the line. i mean, shit, there's women in IM these days. did he think they didn't exist? he's alienating 50% of the population, and that's money being left on the table.